One Hot August Afternoon, . . .

. . . probably around 1923, the kids had gathered at the swimming hole there in North Dakota. 'Freed from church,' it was time for some fun.

The Titanic had long settled on the bottom of the Atlantic, the problem with exposure to gas during the war had mostly died out, and America's 'Teddy Bear' was but lore and history. That day would be of no danger to those whose day had already passed.

Young Cyril jumped into that swimming hole, and didn't come up for a while. It was the most dangerous day in the history of the world - at least from Cyril's perspective. It was a sad day for his family, but it wasn't anybody else's 'most dangerous day;' at least nobody in their family or sight.

In Chicago that day, a child got caught up in some cross-fire. No one was aiming at her; it just happened for no rhyme or reason. In Kansas, a father misjudged the speed of the train, and he, his wife, and their four children are all killed at the intersection. In London, a lamp is tipped over, and three children die in the resultant fire.

The lineage ends for those children, and, in Kansas, for the parents, too.

In many other places, families gathered to pay final respects to great-grandfathers and great-grandmothers.

The lineage continued.

Today, families gathered to pay final respects to great-grandfathers and great-grandmothers, who were only babies on the world's most dangerous day for Cyril; the day they were taken to the funeral so their parents could pay their final respects to their grandparents.

Today, there are no families to gather for those children who died that hot August afternoon in North Dakota.

The story has been over for them for decades.

Edison's Voice Machine

Edison not only determined how to convert electrical particles into superior light particles, he also did amazing things with sound. He figured out how to record what was said, which had always been accomplished through writing, and play it back to create 'new sound waves' that were actually 'replications of past sound waves.'

I've heard that Edison, at the time of his death, was working on an invention with which he could 'record Jesus.'

It is not logical that he was trying to 'go back in time' lest his research would have been on materials to withstand friction. He also lived before Einstein, so he wouldn't have known how Einstein defined time.

So, 'if Edison thought he could record Jesus,' it makes more sense that he thought 'he could go out and retrieve it as a sound wave.' Edison had to understand gravity, so what would make him believe that he could 'find the words of Jesus amongst the mass of noise, especially the words other people have spoken?'

It is logical, then, that he believed the waves that are 'commonly spoken' would 'amass,' 'creating physical weight or gravity.' That which is 'uncommonly spoken,' would amass only with that which others have 'uncommonly spoken,' thus having little physical mass, and, consequently, drawing no matter to it and so small as to create weight to attract it to larger masses.

First, was Edison really working on such a machine?

The Quantum Leap

Einstein said, 'reality is an illusion - albeit a very persistent one.'

The quantum leap is a phenomenon that occurs with some, maybe all, sub-atomic particles. (A light particle is an example of something that is sub-atomic.)

It has been observed that, at least some (my lack of research, not that others don't already know), sub-atomic particles 'appear to be one place at one moment,' and 'then another place at the next moment,' 'with no lapse in time.'

Simple. It's moving there 'at the speed of light.' No time lapses to us, but it actually 'aged' 'relative to the time it took to get there.' 'If it actually took no time,' 'then its age remains relative' to 'how much we aged in no time.'

Since we see this phenomenon occur as 'the light was here at one moment' and 'there the next moment' with 'no lapse in time,' we presume that the second event happened 'later in time.'

I can think of two phemomenna that may be actually happening if these particles are really 'moving faster than the speed of light.'

1. There may be fewer of these particles than we believe exist because the same particle may actually give 'an illusion' that 'there are many of these particles,' though 'it is really just the same particle in different places at the same time.'

2. The second event actually occurred first, and the particle actually is 'aging in reverse to time.' As such, 'when we see that the particle is created,' 'we are actually seeing its death.' Paradoxically, 'that which we see as its demise,' 'would actually be its creation.'

Please Mr. Einstein, is the relative heat presence factor increasing or decreasing?!

Magnetism

Magnetism is a physical force in which ions within a mass are super-actively moving from the positive pole to seek the negative pole. We can extend a magnet by placing the positive pole to the negative pole of another magnet. Though physically two magnets, the ionic movement flows from the positive pole of the first magnet, and seeks the negative pole of the second magnet, as if it were one mass. The strength of the 'magnetic field,' then, is calculated on the 'number of ions relative to the mass which comprises that which is magnetized.' If the second magnet is the same size, but has a greater number of ions, then its addition to mass containing fewer ions, will 'increase the power of the magnetic field,' and the 'new magnet' will be 'stronger than the weaker, first magnet, but weaker than the stronger, second magnet.'

Once in the 'magnetic field,' it seems logical to me that the magnet would then 'bear the physical weight of the attracted mass' 'in relative proportion' 'to the density of ionic content in that which it attracts,' and 'to the distance between the source of magnetism and that which is attracted to it.'

Let's get into sub-atomic particles.

So, If One Object is Larger Than Another Object . . .

. . . will the larger object always have more gravity than the smaller object?

Not necessarily. Gravity is based on the 'mass' of the object. The mass of an object is created not only by an object's size (area), but also by its density. For example, a bowling ball has more mass than a balloon the same size because a bowling ball has more density than a balloon.

How does an object's mass work within another object's gravity? It becomes weight.

'When two objects the same size,' 'but with different densities,' 'are both subject to the gravity of a third object,' 'the one that is more massive' 'will weigh more.'

The differences in densities, and therefore the 'relative weight,' causes air to float above the more massive water, and water to float above the more massive minerals.

Vacuum

Because the physical force of vacuum is applied to a common household cleaning utensil, most people think vacuum is 'something that creates suction.' It isn't and doesn't.

Vacuum is 'space without air.' A vacuum cleaner does not 'suck air in.' It creates uneven air pressure by removing air from a canister. Air, then, rushes in through an orifice to fill 'the void of air in the canister.' The air entering the canister is not pulled in; it is actually pushed in by the air behind it.

A more common household item that uses vacuum is the light bulb. Inside the bulb of glass, there is no air. It is essential that there be no oxygen around the filament, because, otherwise, we would have all the necessary elements for 'fire' (ignition, fuel, and oxygen), and the filament (fuel) would last about as long as someone holding the string of a kite if the kite is struck by lightning. When a light bulb breaks, it does not 'explode;' rather, it 'implodes.'

The largest vacuum that is visible to the human eye is in the sky just beyond the atmosphere, a.k.a. space or outer space.

So, why doesn't the air in Earth's atmosphere rush to fill that vast void?

It tries, but the Earth's gravity pulls air particles toward the center of Earth against the vacuum of space. The air within the gravitational pull creates the atmosphere.

That's how powerful gravity is.

Ladies, It's Been Out of My Control

I'm aware that mothers are far more important than fathers.

I'm aware that the matriarchal concept of Mother Nature makes much more sense than the patriarchal concept of God as to the birth of life.

I'm aware that the person deserving the most gravity in my lifetime has been Mother Teresa.

Thank you for exercising that extraordinary gift of patience, which God so wisely thought to give you, while I rambled about those from the least important gender. I'm just following where my thoughts lead as my thoughts lead me there.

Women: you can't live without them for women are the source of life.