There are small atomic charges with the cells. These will die at the point of death known as cellular death, the final phase of human death. At this point, fingernails and hair stop growing, and there is no cellular growth. The body is fully into decomposition at this stage.
The antiquated thought of the point of death was when we stopped breathing and our hearts stopped beating. There is a cessation of another measurable human electricity, but those waves can be regained if restarted soon after the waves stop. It would stop oxygen flow to the brain, which would set off the natural survival instinct or will to survive.
Today we recognize the point of death to be the cessation of brain activity, which is also a measurable wave.
Chronilogically, most natural death, the exceptions being those who have artificial heart stimuli and respiratory aids, would likely occur in the order of heart/respiration, brain function, and, finally, cellular death.
Those are known electical impulses that eminate from within our physical structure. What about those charged particles that are around us. Is it possible that our 'forces' of magnetism and such actually tie some of the particles to us auch that our bodies would bear the weight of these particles?
For it to be a 'soul,' these particles would also need to be tied together somehow to form a mass so immense that its density has never been noticed.
The spectrum of light is so immense, and only a small portion of it is visible.
Atheists explain the 'illusion of light' as an interpretation of the ocular portion of the brain as brain cells die. If that is the case, then there should be a correlation between 'how much light is seen in an NDE' and the number of dead brain cells from the oxygen deprivation during the alleged NDE.
Another mathematically sound concept is that of traveling faster that the speed of light. It would, it seem, create the same illusion as one gets from the split lines in a freeway, in that the faster one goes, the less noticeable are the points that have no paint. The line doesn't 'disappear;' it 'appears to become a solid line.' If it were haphazard, one would occasionally notice the blank spots as the solid. It seems to be a constant factor in that scenario. Since light rays are waves, we would pass through the waves if on a plain. The light, no light, light, no light pattern would be very similar in design to the freeway line.
Another consideration is whether all lights within the spectrum travel at the 'speed of light,' or if the speed of light varies throughout the spectrum.
I need to google what has been researched on the correlation between the amount of light claimed to have been seen, and the number of victim brain cells.
Wednesday, July 04, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Working William
William is my best friend at this point of my life. He has an uncommon developed talent for understanding processes, though I don't thin...
-
The generation after Socrates' death, his philosophies were made very popular by those who knew him, one of whom was Plato. Plato had a ...
-
e=mc 2 ; so what does it mean? It is how time works. I haven't actually studied what Einstein wrote, so forgive me if I don't use th...
-
We've all heard the old adage 'seeing is believing.' Don't believe it; it's a myth. If we believed everything we saw, th...
No comments:
Post a Comment