The Quantum Leap

Einstein said, 'reality is an illusion - albeit a very persistent one.'

The quantum leap is a phenomenon that occurs with some, maybe all, sub-atomic particles. (A light particle is an example of something that is sub-atomic.)

It has been observed that, at least some (my lack of research, not that others don't already know), sub-atomic particles 'appear to be one place at one moment,' and 'then another place at the next moment,' 'with no lapse in time.'

Simple. It's moving there 'at the speed of light.' No time lapses to us, but it actually 'aged' 'relative to the time it took to get there.' 'If it actually took no time,' 'then its age remains relative' to 'how much we aged in no time.'

Since we see this phenomenon occur as 'the light was here at one moment' and 'there the next moment' with 'no lapse in time,' we presume that the second event happened 'later in time.'

I can think of two phemomenna that may be actually happening if these particles are really 'moving faster than the speed of light.'

1. There may be fewer of these particles than we believe exist because the same particle may actually give 'an illusion' that 'there are many of these particles,' though 'it is really just the same particle in different places at the same time.'

2. The second event actually occurred first, and the particle actually is 'aging in reverse to time.' As such, 'when we see that the particle is created,' 'we are actually seeing its death.' Paradoxically, 'that which we see as its demise,' 'would actually be its creation.'

Please Mr. Einstein, is the relative heat presence factor increasing or decreasing?!