If we correct some adages from long ago and far away, we might be able to understand what others who didn't have historical reference to Mr. Einstein have realized.
We've heard that 'our eyes are the windows to our souls.' I suspect that adage is older than the cameral lens, and, because whoever said it 'saw the light,' but didn't have the theory of refractory to reference, 'mistook the camera lens he was really seeing for a window.'
When one considers the inspiration Lewis Carroll had to 'take Alice through the looking glass,' just beyond that material that absorbs all light that hits it, 'causing our minds to deduct the image as positive reflection,' also occurred prior to Einstein's e=mc2, did 'he just mistake the mirror for that fine line that divides a light particle's positive cycle from its negative cycle?
We only see the negative side of light. Our gravity, will weigh us down when it is subject to a larger object's gravity.
Everything we know about the mind is that we subtract to think (deduce) and our brains necessarily needs to be cross-wired.
Dr. MacDougall attempted to prove that the soul was the same in every person. His results were consistent that there was weight loss, but it occurred irregularly between subjects. That has bothered me, but that irregularity may be theorized within a life concept that takes into consideration that others have seen this, but they just didn't have today's science to refer to in order to 'know that which they saw.'
Here is where I'm at: our minds work deductively; we see color by subtracting what is missing (I think); our eyes work through refractory of light; we know that science depicts light through a spectrum that appears to begin and end, but is really infinite (I think); we know if one continues an arc infinitely, we really just 'keep going around in a circle.'
Who wrote the Wizard of Oz, and what inspired that? That story also depicts a dream or near-death-experience, or halleucination, or whatever one prescribes to with their principles, in which there was a more colorful realm.
Folks, if this is adding up, you better look up to the light and try to find it, because, if you don't, you're bound for a place the Bible conceives as hell! However, if you're not too bad, you can stay in a place the Catholics conceive as Purgatory, which, if it is as it seems right now, would be a reincarnation without ascent or descent, as in . . . here? Who knows? I don't.
So is everything we see really here and out there? Yes, but 'we see it in only in the negative light.'
I would suggest that had Dr. MacDougall not been prejudiced on his first study, he may have detected a much smaller departure, with 'most of the weight leaving at once and finally.' Perhaps that subject had a 'lighter soul' having shed 'his life's burdens;' whereas, those with more balanced departures had heavier, more laden souls, and shed less of "their lives' burdens."
Dr. King may have been referring to this phenomena when he said that unjust suffering is redemptive.
Is what the Bible describes as Heaven really 'that which exists/is visible on the positive cycle of light?'
While we understand through nature that a rodent's main 'purpose in life' is to be food for predators, and how important flies are to the eco-system, we tend to want to regard humans as 'the highest form of life,' because, of course, 'we are at the top of the food chain' 'where we are at in' 'the cycle of life.'
If this were to prove out to be true, then, logically, our physical form's purpose here is for the soul's use/consumption to lighten its load, become more emburdoned, or remain about the same. A ghost could really exist if one soul were to amass sufficiently to be barely visible. Aside from the purpose, ghosts and angels are both 'mythical manifestetations of dead people.' Could it just be that soul's lighter load the reason those images which allegedly have manifested as angels appear to fly, relative to the heavy load of the souls that are the rather morbid and scary images described in alleged manifestations of ghosts?
If this were to prove out to be true, conceptually, 'those alive here are really the lives that are in the graves from the higher form of life,' and 'we are living on the other side of the looking glass!'
One could then conclude that 'life on the negative side of light' is the 'illusion/halleucination/reflection' of that which is reality! People may be those who died in a higher life form, and carried too much burden from that realm; the ascending souls of that which have shed sufficient burden from lower life forms, and those who just keep going around the proverbial circle. It has the essential balance of positive, negative, and neutral.
Whether we ascend, descend, or stay the same would then be determined by how much of life's baggage we are able to shed while we are here!
-----------------------------------
Mother Teresa, you must be next to study, but I am nowhere near worthy to be in the light you must see. Thank you for the comfort and love your image brings to me. I know of no one from my lifetime who has been as beautiful as you are.
No comments:
Post a Comment